It is commonly supposed that the failed effort to amend the constitution was the main factor that sealed the fate of the Free National Movement in last year’s general election.
The unprecedented February, 2002, referendum on five amendments was billed as a key test of the government’s popularity. The referendum followed a 30-day campaign period, which followed a year-long parliamentary process that involved 10 votes by MPs, all of whom voted in favour of the amendments.
The key proposal was to remove legal discrimination against women in terms of their ability to confer nationality on their children and spouses. The other proposals were all relatively minor and non-controversial.
Even some FNM leaders complained that the referendum process was rushed because of the desire for a spring election and other complicating factors involving the leadership transition from Hubert Ingraham to Tommy Turnquest.
There was a 65-per-cent turnout for the referendum and all the amendments were defeated, signalling the end of the Ingraham era.
The PLP promised a full review of the entire constitution if they were elected. And, eight months later, the Christie government appointed its constitutional commission under the chairmanship of veteran lawyer Paul Adderley.
This 22-member body is supposed to be undertaking consultations throughout the country as part of a two-year review of the country’s basic law. According to the Prime Minister, all political parties and non-governmental organisations would be invited to appear before the commission.
It’s time for a first-quarter report to the electorate.
Editorial, The Nassau Guardian
